Mejora de la seguridad vial peatonal mediante la Ruta Troncal 1 del sistema BRT en Chihuahua: análisis 2015-2020
Impacto na segurança viária de pedestres do sistema de transporte BRT na cidade de Chihuahua
Palavras-chave:
segurança viária, mobilidade urbana, transporte público, caminhabilidadeResumo
O modelo urbano de Chihuahua, caracterizado pela sua fragmentação, intensificou a dependência do automóvel particular, gerando externalidades negativas como mortes e ferimentos graves devido a acidentes rodoviários que afetam principalmente os pedestres. Nesse contexto, o sistema de transporte BRT, inaugurado em 2013, representa o projeto mais importante da entidade; No entanto, não existem estudos públicos que avaliem o seu impacto. Este trabalho analisa a influência da rota troncal 1 do BRT na segurança viária de pedestres por meio de análises cartográficas e auditorias de transitabilidade. Os resultados mostram que, embora o objetivo do BRT não fosse servir como política de segurança viária, sua implementação reduziu os acidentes no seu entorno. Isto se deve ao redesenho geométrico e à incorporação de travessias seguras ao nível da rua, que atenuam a velocidade veicular, principal fator de risco para a segurança dos pedestres.Referências
Andrade-Ochoa, S., & Chaparro-Gómez, V. I. (2022). Relación cuantitativa entre atropellamientos y puentes peatonales en Chihuahua, México. Revista INVI, 37(106), 121-148.
Andrade-Ochoa, S., Chaparro-Gómez, V. I., Martínez-García, E. E., & Pérez-Fuentes, F. R. (2020). Evaluación de puentes peatonales de la ciudad de Chihuahua, México. Planeo, 90, 1-13.
Aziz, H. A., Ukkusuri, S. V., & Hasan, S. (2013). Exploring the determinants of pedestrian–vehicle crash severity in New York City. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 1298-1309.
Ballabio, D., Grisoni, F., & Todeschini, R. (2018). Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 174, 33-44.
Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American journal of preventive medicine, 36(4), S99-S123.
Choi, K., Park, H. J., & Dewald, J. (2021). The impact of mixes of transportation options on residential property values: Synergistic effects of walkability. Cities, 111, 103080.
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban design, 14(1), 65-84.
Galanis, A., Botzoris, G., & Eliou, N. (2017). Pedestrian road safety in relation to urban road type and traffic flow. Transportation research procedia, 24, 220-227.
Galindo, L. M., Heres, D. R., & Sánchez, L. (2006). Tráfico inducido en México: contribuciones al debate e implicaciones de política pública. Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 21(1), 123-157.
Gan, Z., Yang, M., Zeng, Q., & Timmermans, H. J. (2021). Associations between built environment, perceived walkability/bikeability and metro transfer patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 153, 171-187.
Gaona, M. F. M. G. (2023). Producción desigual del espacio y sus implicaciones en la Zona Metropolitana de Querétaro, México: fragmentación, dispersión y (auto) segregación urbana/Unequal Production of Space and its Implications in the Metropolitan Area of Querétaro, Mexico: Urban Fragmentation, Dispersion and (Self) Segregation. Journal of Latin American Geography, 22(3), 87-113.
Gómez Méndez, Á., Ocampo Sánchez, M. A., & González Luque, J. C. (2015). La relación entre velocidad y seguridad vial: estado actual de conocimientos. Securitas Vialis, 7, 1-11.
Guzmán-Ramírez, A., & Hernández-Sainz, K. M. (2013). La fragmentación urbana y la segregación social. Una aproximación conceptual. LEGADO de Arquitectura y Diseño, 8(14), 41-56.
Henary, B. Y., Ivarsson, J., & Crandall, J. R. (2006). The influence of age on the morbidity and mortality of pedestrian victims. Traffic injury prevention, 7(2), 182-190.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2020) Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020.
Jacobsen, P. L. (2015). Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury prevention, 21(4), 271-275.
Landman, K. (2011). Urban fragmentation: Different views on its causes and consequences. International handbook of urban policy, 3, 39-61.
Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health & place, 13(1), 111-122.
Levulytė, L., Baranyai, D., Sokolovskij, E., & Török, Á. (2017). Pedestrians’ role in road accidents. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 7(3), 328-341.
Lo, R. H. (2009). Walkability: what is it?. Journal of Urbanism, 2(2), 145-166.
Moradi, A., & Esmaeilzadeh, S. (2015). Association between reaction time, speed and agility in schoolboys. Sport Sciences for Health, 11, 251-256.
Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Garvin, C., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., ... & Lin, L. (2006). Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of physical activity and health, 3(s1), S99-S117.
Mukherjee, D., & Mitra, S. (2022). Development of a systematic methodology to enhance the safety of vulnerable road users in developing countries. Transportation in developing economies, 8(2), 28.
Navarro Arredondo, A. (2019). Control de la contaminación atmosférica en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México. Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 34(3), 631-663.
Oh, S., Lentzakis, A. F., Seshadri, R., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2021). Impacts of Automated Mobility-on-Demand on traffic dynamics, energy and emissions: A case study of Singapore. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 110, 102327.
Peniche-Camps, S., & Cortez-Huerta, M. (2020). La costumbre al envenenamiento: El caso de los contaminantes atmosféricos de la ciudad de Guadalajara, México. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 54(2), 1-19.
Rodríguez, S. (2021). Calidad del aire ambiente, inhalación de contaminantes y consultas en los servicios de urgencia. Emergencias, 33, 411-412.
Shields, R., Gomes da Silva, E. J., Lima e Lima, T., & Osorio, N. (2023). Walkability: a review of trends. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(1), 19-41.
Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (2022) Boletín Epidemiológico del Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica. Secretaría de Salud, sem 52, 65.
Valero, C. F. F., & Puerta, C. P. (2014). Identification of the main risk factors for vulnerable non-motorized users in the city of Manizales and its relationship with the quality of road infrastructure. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 162, 359-367.
Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Dyck, D., & Deforche, B. (2016). Neighborhood walkability and health outcomes among older adults: The mediating role of physical activity. Health & place, 37, 16-25.
World Health Organization. (2023). Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. World Health Organization.
Yañez-Orozco, H., & Bravo-Peña, L. C. (2022). Índice de motorización, vehículos legales e ilegales: el caso de la ciudad Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua. Acta Universitaria 32, e3207.
Zębala, J., Ciępka, P., & Reza, A. (2012). Pedestrian acceleration and speeds. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 91, 227-234.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
